Resolving insolvency - Score in Sudan
Sudan: Resolving insolvency - Score was 28.78 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency - Score in Sudan, 2004–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency - score in Sudan stood at 28.78.
That represents a change of down 25.7% on the previous year and up 8.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency - score in Sudan peaked at 38.73 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 25.26, in 2004.
That places Sudan 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 16 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency - Score in Sudan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 25.26 | — |
| 2005 | 26.79 | +6.0% |
| 2006 | 26.85 | +0.2% |
| 2007 | 26.36 | -1.8% |
| 2008 | 26.63 | +1.0% |
| 2009 | 26.63 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 26.79 | +0.6% |
| 2011 | 27.26 | +1.8% |
| 2012 | 27.26 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 27.26 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 26.54 | -2.7% |
| 2015 | 26.45 | -0.3% |
| 2016 | 26.45 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 26.39 | -0.2% |
| 2018 | 38.73 | +46.8% |
| 2019 | 28.78 | -25.7% |
Sudan compared with similar countries
- Sudan's 28.78 is below the median for low income countries, which is 30.48, 94% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Sudan's 28.78 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 36.72, 78% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Resolving insolvency - Score in Sudan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | +46.8% | 26.39 | 38.73 |
| 2019 | -25.7% | 38.73 | 28.78 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.42 | 25.26 | 26.85 | 6 |
| 2010s | 28.19 | 26.39 | 38.73 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sudan
- 150 Ethiopia 30.34 compare
- 151 Mongolia 30.12 compare
- 152 Lebanon 29.08 compare
- 154 Tajikistan 28.43 compare
- 155 Bangladesh 28.14 compare
- 156 Central African Republic 28.12 compare
- 156 Chad 28.12 compare
More reference data data for Sudan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5846 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 17.81 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.69 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4356 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.69 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.96 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8148 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 80.68 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 93.88 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.37 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency - score in Sudan?
- Resolving insolvency - score in Sudan was 28.78 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency - score recorded in Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 38.73 in 2018.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency - score recorded in Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 25.26 in 2004.
- How does Sudan rank for resolving insolvency - score?
- Sudan ranks 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency - score rising or falling in Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.