Central African Republic vs Sudan: Resolving insolvency - Score

Central African Republic
28.12
in 2019
Sudan
28.78
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
153rd
Sudan rank
150th

Resolving insolvency - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Sudan
010203040200320112019

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 28.78 against 28.12 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.66.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 153rd and Sudan ranks 150th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 28.12 26.42 1.71 Central African Republic
2010s 28.12 28.19 0.0657 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Central African Republic or Sudan?
Sudan, at 28.78 against 28.12 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Central African Republic and Sudan?
0.66, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sudan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Sudan rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
Central African Republic ranks 153rd and Sudan ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.