Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda

Rwanda: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
5 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
73rd
of 190 countries
All-time high
6 DB15-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda, 2003–2019

234562003201120192003: 2 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 4 DB15-20 methodology2010: 4 DB15-20 methodology2011: 4 DB15-20 methodology2012: 4 DB15-20 methodology2013: 4 DB15-20 methodology2014: 4 DB15-20 methodology2015: 6 DB15-20 methodology2016: 6 DB15-20 methodology2017: 6 DB15-20 methodology2018: 5 DB15-20 methodology2019: 5 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Rwanda recorded 5 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in 2019.

The figure is up 25.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda peaked at 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2015 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Rwanda 73rd out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda, year by year

Annual values for Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) in Rwanda, 2003 to 2019.
Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 2 DB15-20 methodology
2004 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2005 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2006 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2007 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2008 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2009 4 DB15-20 methodology +100.0%
2010 4 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 4 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 4 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 4 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 4 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 6 DB15-20 methodology +50.0%
2016 6 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 6 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 5 DB15-20 methodology -16.7%
2019 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.29 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 4 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 4.8 DB15-20 methodology 4 DB15-20 methodology 6 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Rwanda

  1. 73 Indonesia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 73 Russia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 73 Australia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 73 Brunei Darussalam 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 73 Cyprus 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 73 Hungary 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 73 Ireland 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 73 Latvia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 73 Norway 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 73 Seychelles 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 73 Thailand 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 73 United Kingdom 5 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Rwanda

All data for Rwanda →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Rwanda?
The highest recorded value was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Rwanda?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Rwanda rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Rwanda ranks 73rd out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Rwanda?
Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Rwanda data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/rwanda/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Rwanda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.