Regulatory Quality in Comoros
Comoros: Regulatory Quality was 0.2138 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality in Comoros, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
In 2011, regulatory quality in Comoros stood at 0.2138 standard error.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% on the previous year and down 28.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality in Comoros peaked at 0.4796 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.2127 standard error, in 2005.
Comoros ranks 2nd of 53 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality in Comoros, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.4796 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.3271 standard error | -31.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2989 standard error | -8.6% |
| 2002 | 0.2995 standard error | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 0.2508 standard error | -16.2% |
| 2004 | 0.2349 standard error | -6.4% |
| 2005 | 0.2127 standard error | -9.4% |
| 2006 | 0.2313 standard error | +8.7% |
| 2007 | 0.2323 standard error | +0.4% |
| 2008 | 0.2129 standard error | -8.4% |
| 2009 | 0.2167 standard error | +1.8% |
| 2010 | 0.2144 standard error | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 0.2138 standard error | -0.3% |
Comoros compared with similar countries
- Comoros's 0.2138 standard error is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.163 standard error, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Comoros's 0.2138 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1645 standard error, 1.3× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4034 standard error | 0.3271 standard error | 0.4796 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2433 standard error | 0.2127 standard error | 0.2995 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.2141 standard error | 0.2138 standard error | 0.2144 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Comoros
- 1 Somalia 0.2155 standard error compare
- 3 Seychelles 0.2119 standard error compare
- 4 Guinea-Bissau 0.2076 standard error compare
- 5 Djibouti 0.1991 standard error compare
- 5 Equatorial Guinea 0.1991 standard error compare
- 5 Sao Tome and Principe 0.1991 standard error compare
More reference data data for Comoros
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0385 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0444 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0444 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0068 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0026 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1837 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2155 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0211 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality in Comoros?
- Regulatory quality in Comoros was 0.2138 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest regulatory quality recorded in Comoros?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4796 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality recorded in Comoros?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2127 standard error in 2005.
- How does Comoros rank for regulatory quality?
- Comoros ranks 2nd out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is regulatory quality rising or falling in Comoros?
- Over the last ten years it is down 28.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Comoros data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.