Comoros vs Guinea-Bissau: Regulatory Quality
Comoros
0.2138 standard error
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
0.2076 standard error
in 2011
Comoros rank
2nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
4th
Regulatory Quality over time
- Comoros
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.2138 standard error against 0.2076 standard error in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0062 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 2nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4034 standard error | 0.3731 standard error | 0.0302 standard error | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.2433 standard error | 0.2192 standard error | 0.0241 standard error | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.2141 standard error | 0.2062 standard error | 0.0079 standard error | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Comoros or Guinea-Bissau?
- Comoros, at 0.2138 standard error against 0.2076 standard error in Guinea-Bissau as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0062 standard error, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Comoros and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Comoros ranks 2nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.