Regulatory Quality in Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso: Regulatory Quality was 0.1617 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling

Latest (2011)
0.1617 standard error
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
34th
of 53 countries
All-time high
0.4017 standard error
in 1996
All-time low
0.1617 standard error
in 2011
Years of data
13
1996–2011

Regulatory Quality in Burkina Faso, 1996–2011

00.10.20.30.41996200320111996: 0.402 standard error1998: 0.298 standard error2000: 0.272 standard error2002: 0.23 standard error2003: 0.198 standard error2004: 0.19 standard error2005: 0.181 standard error2006: 0.171 standard error2007: 0.17 standard error2008: 0.168 standard error2009: 0.162 standard error2010: 0.162 standard error2011: 0.162 standard error

Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.

Analysis

The most recent figure for regulatory quality in Burkina Faso is 0.1617 standard error, measured in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.

That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and down 40.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, regulatory quality in Burkina Faso peaked at 0.4017 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1617 standard error, in 2011.

That places Burkina Faso 34th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.3498 standard error 0.2979 standard error 0.4017 standard error 2
2000s 0.1937 standard error 0.1622 standard error 0.2724 standard error 9
2010s 0.1617 standard error 0.1617 standard error 0.1618 standard error 2

Countries ranked near Burkina Faso

  1. 34 Angola 0.1617 standard error compare
  2. 34 Botswana 0.1617 standard error compare
  3. 34 Cameroon 0.1617 standard error compare
  4. 34 Cote d'Ivoire 0.1617 standard error compare
  5. 34 Egypt 0.1617 standard error compare
  6. 34 Ethiopia 0.1617 standard error compare
  7. 34 Ghana 0.1617 standard error compare
  8. 34 Kenya 0.1617 standard error compare
  9. 34 Madagascar 0.1617 standard error compare
  10. 34 Mali 0.1617 standard error compare
  11. 34 Mozambique 0.1617 standard error compare
  12. 34 Nigeria 0.1617 standard error compare
  13. 34 Senegal 0.1617 standard error compare
  14. 34 Tanzania 0.1617 standard error compare
  15. 34 Tunisia 0.1617 standard error compare
  16. 34 Uganda 0.1617 standard error compare
  17. 34 Zambia 0.1617 standard error compare
  18. 34 Zimbabwe 0.1617 standard error compare

See the full ranking of 53 places →

More reference data data for Burkina Faso

All data for Burkina Faso →

Frequently asked questions

What is regulatory quality in Burkina Faso?
Regulatory quality in Burkina Faso was 0.1617 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
What is the highest regulatory quality recorded in Burkina Faso?
The highest recorded value was 0.4017 standard error in 1996.
What is the lowest regulatory quality recorded in Burkina Faso?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1617 standard error in 2011.
How does Burkina Faso rank for regulatory quality?
Burkina Faso ranks 34th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
Is regulatory quality rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
Over the last ten years it is down 40.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.