Burkina Faso vs Ethiopia: Regulatory Quality

Burkina Faso
0.1617 standard error
in 2011
Ethiopia
0.1617 standard error
in 2011
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Ethiopia rank
34th

Regulatory Quality over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Ethiopia
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.1617 standard error against 0.1617 standard error in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Ethiopia ranks 34th of 53 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3498 standard error 0.294 standard error 0.0558 standard error Burkina Faso
2000s 0.1937 standard error 0.1825 standard error 0.0112 standard error Burkina Faso
2010s 0.1617 standard error 0.1617 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality, Burkina Faso or Ethiopia?
Burkina Faso, at 0.1617 standard error against 0.1617 standard error in Ethiopia as of 2011.
What is the difference in regulatory quality between Burkina Faso and Ethiopia?
0 standard error, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ethiopia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Burkina Faso and Ethiopia rank globally for regulatory quality?
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Ethiopia ranks 34th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.