Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Uzbekistan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Uzbekistan recorded -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2025. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
That represents a change of up 5.3% on the previous year and up 64.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Uzbekistan peaked at -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Uzbekistan ranks 138th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.8% |
| 2000 | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.0% |
| 2002 | -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.3% |
| 2003 | -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2004 | -1.68 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2005 | -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.1% |
| 2006 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2007 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.1% |
| 2008 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2009 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.0% |
| 2010 | -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2011 | -1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.3% |
| 2012 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2013 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2014 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2015 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.0% |
| 2016 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2017 | -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.8% |
| 2018 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.1% |
| 2019 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.9% |
| 2020 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.2% |
| 2021 | -0.6751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -39.2% |
| 2022 | -0.6294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2023 | -0.6728 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.9% |
| 2024 | -0.5493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.4% |
| 2025 | -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 81% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.95 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.6929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Uzbekistan?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Uzbekistan was -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Uzbekistan ranks 138th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 64.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.