Naoero vs Uzbekistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Naoero
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Naoero currently reports -0.5245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.0022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 138th and Uzbekistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Naoero |
| 2010s | -0.6517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7128 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Naoero |
| 2020s | -0.4323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Naoero or Uzbekistan?
- Naoero, at -0.5245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Naoero and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Uzbekistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Naoero and Uzbekistan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Naoero ranks 138th and Uzbekistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.