Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Pakistan
Pakistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Pakistan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Pakistan stood at -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of down 10.0% on the previous year and down 37.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Pakistan peaked at -0.4879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006 and was at its lowest, -0.987 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
That places Pakistan 173rd out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.6399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.7693 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.2% |
| 2000 | -0.8991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.9% |
| 2002 | -0.9021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2003 | -0.9182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2004 | -0.987 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.5% |
| 2005 | -0.6083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.4% |
| 2006 | -0.4879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.8% |
| 2007 | -0.5375 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.2% |
| 2008 | -0.646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.2% |
| 2009 | -0.6766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.7% |
| 2010 | -0.6767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.7454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.1% |
| 2012 | -0.7817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2013 | -0.7851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2014 | -0.7265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2015 | -0.6693 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2016 | -0.6515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.7% |
| 2017 | -0.6574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2018 | -0.6639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2019 | -0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.8% |
| 2020 | -0.6985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.7% |
| 2021 | -0.6607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2022 | -0.7766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.5% |
| 2023 | -0.8494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.4% |
| 2024 | -0.8341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2025 | -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.0% |
Pakistan compared with similar countries
- Pakistan's -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.4× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Pakistan's -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.4592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.7046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7693 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.7403 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.987 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.6983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.7895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 170 Liberia -0.8653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 171 Burundi -0.8681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 172 Djibouti -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 174 Bangladesh -0.9378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 175 Sao Tome and Principe -0.939 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 176 Nicaragua -0.943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Pakistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 20.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 91.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 260 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.79 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Pakistan?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Pakistan was -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.4879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.987 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Pakistan rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Pakistan ranks 173rd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 37.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.