Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Djibouti
Djibouti: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Djibouti, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Djibouti stood at -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is down 1.9% on the previous year and down 16.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Djibouti peaked at -0.6063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003 and was at its lowest, -0.8817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Djibouti 172nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Djibouti, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.8817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.8697 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2000 | -0.7463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.2% |
| 2002 | -0.6084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.5% |
| 2003 | -0.6063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2004 | -0.7136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.7% |
| 2005 | -0.6477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.2% |
| 2006 | -0.6766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.5% |
| 2007 | -0.6618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2008 | -0.6916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.5% |
| 2009 | -0.7303 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.6% |
| 2010 | -0.7826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.2% |
| 2011 | -0.7714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2012 | -0.7073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.3% |
| 2013 | -0.7695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.8% |
| 2014 | -0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.0% |
| 2015 | -0.7471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2016 | -0.7315 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.1% |
| 2017 | -0.6976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.6% |
| 2018 | -0.7608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2019 | -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2020 | -0.846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.7% |
| 2021 | -0.7805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.7% |
| 2022 | -0.7814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2023 | -0.8066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2024 | -0.8549 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.0% |
| 2025 | -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
Djibouti compared with similar countries
- Djibouti's -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Djibouti's -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.4592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.9× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.8757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8697 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.6759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.7491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.8234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Djibouti
- 169 Lebanon -0.8532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 170 Liberia -0.8653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 171 Burundi -0.8681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 173 Pakistan -0.9179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 174 Bangladesh -0.9378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 175 Sao Tome and Principe -0.939 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Djibouti
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0052 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2231 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0175 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0092 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0016 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Djibouti?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Djibouti was -0.8712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Djibouti?
- The highest recorded value was -0.6063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Djibouti?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.8817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Djibouti rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Djibouti ranks 172nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Djibouti?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Djibouti data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.