Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius
Mauritius: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Mauritius, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mauritius is 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 9.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mauritius peaked at 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0.1576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Mauritius 38th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.1576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.2533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +60.7% |
| 2000 | 0.3652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +44.2% |
| 2002 | 0.2752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.7% |
| 2003 | 0.4707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +71.1% |
| 2004 | 0.4751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 0.4772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2006 | 0.6164 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.2% |
| 2007 | 0.6774 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.9% |
| 2008 | 0.8691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.3% |
| 2009 | 0.8497 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2010 | 0.8071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.0% |
| 2011 | 0.7678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.9% |
| 2012 | 0.9863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.5% |
| 2013 | 0.9709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2014 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.8% |
| 2015 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.3% |
| 2016 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2017 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2019 | 0.9793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2020 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2021 | 0.9591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2022 | 0.9221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2023 | 0.9501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
| 2024 | 0.9385 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2025 | 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | +71.1% | 0.2752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 1998 | +60.7% | 0.1576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.564 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
More reference data data for Mauritius
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0409 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0343 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2885 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0008 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mauritius?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mauritius was 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Mauritius rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Mauritius ranks 38th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.