Aruba vs Mauritius: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Aruba
- Mauritius
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.9748 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 36th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 206 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4428 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.9775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Aruba or Mauritius?
- Aruba, at 0.9748 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Aruba and Mauritius?
- 0.0427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mauritius?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Mauritius rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 36th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.