Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Eswatini
Eswatini: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate was -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Eswatini, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini is -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.6% on the previous year and down 67.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini peaked at -0.2936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013 and was at its lowest, -0.7473 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Eswatini ranks 150th of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.4745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.4522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2000 | -0.4461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.3% |
| 2002 | -0.3633 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.6% |
| 2003 | -0.3633 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.7473 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +105.7% |
| 2005 | -0.6335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.2% |
| 2006 | -0.435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -31.3% |
| 2007 | -0.5619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.2% |
| 2008 | -0.4101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -27.0% |
| 2009 | -0.3952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2010 | -0.4029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2011 | -0.4456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.6% |
| 2012 | -0.4144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.0% |
| 2013 | -0.2936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.2% |
| 2014 | -0.3806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.6% |
| 2015 | -0.386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2016 | -0.417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
| 2017 | -0.3868 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.2% |
| 2018 | -0.5011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.5% |
| 2019 | -0.523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.4% |
| 2020 | -0.5242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2021 | -0.5237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2022 | -0.622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.8% |
| 2023 | -0.6219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 86% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | -105.7% | -0.3633 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7473 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.484 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7473 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3633 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.4151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More reference data data for Eswatini
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0048 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.026 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini was -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.7473 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Eswatini rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Eswatini ranks 150th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is down 67.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.