Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Eswatini
Eswatini: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.6761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Eswatini, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini is -0.6761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.3% on the previous year and down 101.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini peaked at -0.2611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013 and was at its lowest, -0.7686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Eswatini ranks 152nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.4332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.4212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2000 | -0.4205 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2002 | -0.3628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.7% |
| 2003 | -0.3608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2004 | -0.7686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +113.1% |
| 2005 | -0.6349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.4% |
| 2006 | -0.4139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -34.8% |
| 2007 | -0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.6% |
| 2008 | -0.3927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.3% |
| 2009 | -0.3763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2010 | -0.3628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2011 | -0.3848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.1% |
| 2012 | -0.3584 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2013 | -0.2611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -27.1% |
| 2014 | -0.3413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +30.7% |
| 2015 | -0.3355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2016 | -0.363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.2% |
| 2017 | -0.3422 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.7% |
| 2018 | -0.4502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +31.6% |
| 2019 | -0.4642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2020 | -0.4657 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2021 | -0.4581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2022 | -0.582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.1% |
| 2023 | -0.5818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.3% |
| 2025 | -0.6761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.3% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's -0.6761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's -0.6761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 93% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | -113.1% | -0.3608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.4737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.3664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More reference data data for Eswatini
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0048 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.026 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Eswatini was -0.6761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.7686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Eswatini rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Eswatini ranks 152nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is down 101.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.