Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.7138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Ecuador, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Ecuador is -0.7138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 14.5% on the previous year and up 30.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Ecuador peaked at -0.0651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998 and was at its lowest, -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2009.
That places Ecuador 153rd out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.4377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.0651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -85.1% |
| 2000 | -0.6324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +872.0% |
| 2002 | -0.779 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.2% |
| 2003 | -0.7139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.4% |
| 2004 | -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2005 | -0.8308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.7% |
| 2006 | -0.8979 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.1% |
| 2007 | -0.9306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2008 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.0% |
| 2009 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.1% |
| 2010 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2011 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.1% |
| 2012 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.4% |
| 2013 | -0.8846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.1% |
| 2014 | -0.8196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.4% |
| 2015 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.6% |
| 2016 | -0.9133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.3% |
| 2017 | -0.9715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.4% |
| 2018 | -0.8273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.8% |
| 2019 | -0.7172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.3% |
| 2020 | -0.7119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2021 | -0.5119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -28.1% |
| 2022 | -0.4426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.5% |
| 2023 | -0.5877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.8% |
| 2024 | -0.6234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.1% |
| 2025 | -0.7138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.5% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -0.7138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 7.6× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's -0.7138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.0884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 8.1× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | -872.0% | -0.0651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.8855 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.9589 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Ecuador?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Ecuador was -0.7138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- How does Ecuador rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 153rd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.