Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cuba
Cuba: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Cuba, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Cuba stood at -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is down 8.0% on the previous year and down 51.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Cuba peaked at -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015 and was at its lowest, -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Cuba ranks 197th of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cuba, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2000 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2002 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.9% |
| 2003 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.4% |
| 2004 | -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2005 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.7% |
| 2006 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2007 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
| 2009 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2010 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.3% |
| 2011 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.4% |
| 2013 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2014 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.1% |
| 2015 | -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.0% |
| 2016 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.9% |
| 2017 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2018 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.0% |
| 2019 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2020 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2021 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.8% |
| 2022 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2023 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2024 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.4% |
| 2025 | -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 16.9× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Cuba's -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.0884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 17.9× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Cuba?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Cuba was -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Cuba rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Cuba ranks 197th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 51.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.