Cuba vs Haiti: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Cuba
- Haiti
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Haiti, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 191st and Haiti ranks 192nd of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Haiti in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cuba |
| 2000s | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Haiti |
| 2010s | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Haiti |
| 2020s | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Cuba or Haiti?
- Cuba, at -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Haiti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Cuba and Haiti?
- 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Haiti?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Haiti rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Cuba ranks 191st and Haiti ranks 192nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.