Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Chile
Chile: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Chile, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Chile is 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.
The figure is down 12.8% on the previous year and down 48.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Chile peaked at 1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2025.
Chile ranks 48th of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Chile, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2000 | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.9% |
| 2002 | 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.9% |
| 2003 | 1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.5% |
| 2004 | 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.1% |
| 2005 | 1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.1% |
| 2006 | 1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2007 | 1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2010 | 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.4% |
| 2011 | 1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2012 | 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.2% |
| 2013 | 1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.7% |
| 2015 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.0% |
| 2016 | 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.5% |
| 2017 | 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2018 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2019 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2020 | 0.9379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.1% |
| 2021 | 0.9269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2022 | 0.8891 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.1% |
| 2023 | 0.826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.1% |
| 2024 | 0.7294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.7% |
| 2025 | 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.8% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 70% of the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.0884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 45 Cayman Islands 0.6727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 46 Saudi Arabia 0.6695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 47 Slovenia 0.6605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 49 Georgia 0.6234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 50 Antigua and Barbuda 0.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 51 Bermuda 0.6123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Chile?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Chile was 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- How does Chile rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Chile ranks 48th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.