Chile vs Slovenia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Chile
0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Slovenia
0.6605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Chile rank
48th
Slovenia rank
47th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Chile
  • Slovenia
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.6605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile, a difference of 0.0246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 48th and Slovenia ranks 47th of 206 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2000s 1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 0.8242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Chile or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.6605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Chile and Slovenia?
0.0246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Slovenia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Chile and Slovenia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Chile ranks 48th and Slovenia ranks 47th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Slovenia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/slovenia/">Chile vs Slovenia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.