Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Botswana
Botswana: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Botswana, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Botswana recorded 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.4% on the previous year and down 43.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Botswana peaked at 0.8994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2025.
Botswana ranks 68th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Botswana, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.4803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.8389 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +74.7% |
| 2000 | 0.8391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.8994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.2% |
| 2003 | 0.8872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.729 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.8% |
| 2005 | 0.8031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.2% |
| 2006 | 0.6498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.1% |
| 2007 | 0.6706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2008 | 0.7747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.5% |
| 2009 | 0.8014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 0.8042 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0.8766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.0% |
| 2013 | 0.7758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.5% |
| 2014 | 0.717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.6% |
| 2015 | 0.6236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.0% |
| 2016 | 0.6321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2017 | 0.553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.5% |
| 2018 | 0.571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.3% |
| 2019 | 0.4551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.3% |
| 2020 | 0.4168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.4% |
| 2021 | 0.4742 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.8% |
| 2022 | 0.4802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.3% |
| 2023 | 0.4284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.8% |
| 2024 | 0.3628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.3% |
| 2025 | 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
Botswana compared with similar countries
- Botswana's 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Botswana's 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8389 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.7838 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.6819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0078 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Botswana?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Botswana was 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- How does Botswana rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Botswana ranks 68th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 43.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.