Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Botswana
Botswana: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate was 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Botswana, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Botswana recorded 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.0% on the previous year and down 44.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Botswana peaked at 0.9058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2020.
Botswana ranks 64th of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Botswana, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.8544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +97.8% |
| 2000 | 0.8572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 0.9058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.7% |
| 2003 | 0.8865 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.1% |
| 2004 | 0.721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.7% |
| 2005 | 0.8047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.6% |
| 2006 | 0.6286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.9% |
| 2007 | 0.6526 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2008 | 0.7588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.3% |
| 2009 | 0.7845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2010 | 0.8006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.3% |
| 2012 | 0.8758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.9% |
| 2013 | 0.7803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.9% |
| 2014 | 0.7234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.6069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.1% |
| 2016 | 0.628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2017 | 0.5387 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.2% |
| 2018 | 0.5569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2019 | 0.4297 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.8% |
| 2020 | 0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.4% |
| 2021 | 0.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.2% |
| 2022 | 0.4849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.4% |
| 2023 | 0.4465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2024 | 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.0% |
Botswana compared with similar countries
- Botswana's 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Botswana's 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Botswana changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | +97.8% | 0.432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.7777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4297 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0078 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Botswana?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Botswana was 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0.9058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020.
- How does Botswana rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Botswana ranks 64th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.