Botswana vs Guam: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Botswana
0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Guam
0.3745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Botswana rank
68th
Guam rank
65th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Botswana
  • Guam
00.20.40.60.8199620102025

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0.3745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Botswana, a difference of 0.0202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 68th and Guam ranks 65th of 206 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Guam Difference Ahead
2000s 0.7381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2010s 0.6819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4643 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2020s 0.4195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Botswana or Guam?
Guam, at 0.3745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Botswana as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Botswana and Guam?
0.0202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Guam?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Guam rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Botswana ranks 68th and Guam ranks 65th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Guam: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/guam/">Botswana vs Guam: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.