Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Philippines
Philippines: Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index was 16.67 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Philippines, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Philippines is 16.67, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That places Philippines 129th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Philippines, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | — |
| 2015 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | 0 | — |
| 2017 | 0 | — |
| 2018 | 16.67 | — |
| 2019 | 16.67 | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 129 Puerto Rico 16.67 compare
- 129 Venezuela 16.67 compare
- 132 Afghanistan 0
- 132 Albania 0
- 132 Algeria 0
- 132 Angola 0
- 132 Armenia 0
- 132 Azerbaijan 0
- 132 Belize 0
- 132 Brunei 0
- 132 Burundi 0
- 132 Cape Verde 0
- 132 Cambodia 0
- 132 Cameroon 0
- 132 Central African Republic 0
- 132 Chad 0
- 132 Comoros 0
- 132 Democratic Republic of Congo 0
- 132 Congo 0
- 132 Djibouti 0
- 132 Dominican Republic 0
- 132 Equatorial Guinea 0
- 132 Eritrea 0
- 132 Eswatini 0
- 132 Ethiopia 0
- 132 Gabon 0
- 132 Gambia 0
- 132 Guinea 0
- 132 Haiti 0
- 132 Kiribati 0
- 132 Kosovo 0
- 132 Kyrgyzstan 0
- 132 Laos 0
- 132 Lesotho 0
- 132 Liberia 0
- 132 Libya 0
- 132 Madagascar 0
- 132 Maldives 0
- 132 Marshall Islands 0
- 132 Mauritania 0
- 132 Micronesia (country) 0
- 132 Mozambique 0
- 132 Myanmar 0
- 132 Nicaragua 0
- 132 Palau 0
- 132 Paraguay 0
- 132 Rwanda 0
- 132 Samoa 0
- 132 San Marino 0
- 132 Sao Tome and Principe 0
- 132 Seychelles 0
- 132 Sierra Leone 0
- 132 Solomon Islands 0
- 132 Somalia 0
- 132 South Sudan 0
- 132 Tajikistan 0
- 132 East Timor 0
- 132 Tonga 0
- 132 Uruguay 0
- 132 Vanuatu 0
- 132 Yemen 0
- 132 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 0
More reference data data for Philippines
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 12.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 7.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 10.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 67.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 7.76 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Philippines?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Philippines was 16.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 16.67 in 2018.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2013.
- How does Philippines rank for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index?
- Philippines ranks 129th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of shareholder rights index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.