Philippines vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index
Philippines
16.67
in 2019
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
16.67
in 2019
Philippines rank
129th
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
129th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index over time
- Philippines
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 16.67 against 16.67 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 129th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 129th of 191 countries.
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index, Philippines or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- Philippines, at 16.67 against 16.67 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index between Philippines and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index?
- Philippines ranks 129th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 129th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of shareholder rights index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.