Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Malta

Malta: Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index was 100 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
100
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
100
in 2013
All-time low
100
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Malta, 2013–2019

0204060801002013201620192013: 1002014: 1002015: 1002016: 1002017: 1002018: 1002019: 100

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Malta recorded 100 for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Malta ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Malta, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Malta, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 100
2014 100 +0.0%
2015 100 +0.0%
2016 100 +0.0%
2017 100 +0.0%
2018 100 +0.0%
2019 100 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Malta

  1. 1 India 100 compare
  2. 1 Argentina 100 compare
  3. 1 Bulgaria 100 compare
  4. 1 Chile 100 compare
  5. 1 Croatia 100 compare
  6. 1 Cyprus 100 compare
  7. 1 Egypt 100 compare
  8. 1 Kazakhstan 100 compare
  9. 1 Kenya 100 compare
  10. 1 Morocco 100 compare
  11. 1 Panama 100 compare
  12. 1 Papua New Guinea 100 compare
  13. 1 Peru 100 compare
  14. 1 Slovenia 100 compare
  15. 1 Spain 100 compare
  16. 1 Turkey 100 compare
  17. 1 United Kingdom 100 compare
  18. 1 Zimbabwe 100 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Malta

All data for Malta →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Malta?
Protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Malta was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in Malta?
The highest recorded value was 100 in 2013.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in Malta?
The lowest recorded value was 100 in 2013.
How does Malta rank for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index?
Malta ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index rising or falling in Malta?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Malta data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Malta. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-shareholder-rights-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology-2/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-shareholder-rights-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology-2/malta/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Malta</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of shareholder rights index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.