Malta vs Papua New Guinea: Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index
Malta
100
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
100
in 2019
Malta rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index over time
- Malta
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Malta currently reports 100 against 100 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index, Malta or Papua New Guinea?
- Malta, at 100 against 100 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index between Malta and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Papua New Guinea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Papua New Guinea rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index?
- Malta ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of shareholder rights index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.