Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Mali
Mali: Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index was 66.67 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Mali, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Mali is 66.67, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Mali ranks 65th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in Mali, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 66.67 | — |
| 2014 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Mali
- 65 Bangladesh 66.67 compare
- 65 Nigeria 66.67 compare
- 65 Japan 66.67 compare
- 65 Brazil 66.67 compare
- 65 Australia 66.67 compare
- 65 Belgium 66.67 compare
- 65 Benin 66.67 compare
- 65 Bolivia 66.67 compare
- 65 Bosnia and Herzegovina 66.67 compare
- 65 Botswana 66.67 compare
- 65 Burkina Faso 66.67 compare
- 65 Canada 66.67 compare
- 65 Colombia 66.67 compare
- 65 Cote d'Ivoire 66.67 compare
- 65 El Salvador 66.67 compare
- 65 Fiji 66.67 compare
- 65 France 66.67 compare
- 65 Guinea-Bissau 66.67 compare
- 65 Guyana 66.67 compare
- 65 Hungary 66.67 compare
- 65 Israel 66.67 compare
- 65 South Korea 66.67 compare
- 65 Lithuania 66.67 compare
- 65 Luxembourg 66.67 compare
- 65 Niger 66.67 compare
- 65 Oman 66.67 compare
- 65 Senegal 66.67 compare
- 65 Suriname 66.67 compare
- 65 Taiwan 66.67 compare
- 65 Togo 66.67 compare
- 65 Tunisia 66.67 compare
- 65 Ukraine 66.67 compare
- 65 United Arab Emirates 66.67 compare
- 65 Uzbekistan 66.67 compare
- 65 Vietnam 66.67 compare
- 65 Zambia 66.67 compare
More reference data data for Mali
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3081 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4025 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4728 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 39.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.19 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Mali?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in Mali was 66.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in Mali?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in Mali?
- The lowest recorded value was 66.67 in 2013.
- How does Mali rank for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index?
- Mali ranks 65th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index rising or falling in Mali?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Mali data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of shareholder rights index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.