Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in France
France: Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index was 66.67 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in France, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in France stood at 66.67. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
That places France 65th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index in France, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 66.67 | — |
| 2014 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near France
- 65 Bangladesh 66.67 compare
- 65 Nigeria 66.67 compare
- 65 Japan 66.67 compare
- 65 Brazil 66.67 compare
- 65 Australia 66.67 compare
- 65 Belgium 66.67 compare
- 65 Benin 66.67 compare
- 65 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 66.67 compare
- 65 Bosnia and Herzegovina 66.67 compare
- 65 Botswana 66.67 compare
- 65 Burkina Faso 66.67 compare
- 65 Canada 66.67 compare
- 65 Colombia 66.67 compare
- 65 Côte d'Ivoire 66.67 compare
- 65 El Salvador 66.67 compare
- 65 Fiji 66.67 compare
- 65 Guinea-Bissau 66.67 compare
- 65 Guyana 66.67 compare
- 65 Hungary 66.67 compare
- 65 Israel 66.67 compare
- 65 Republic of Korea 66.67 compare
- 65 Lithuania 66.67 compare
- 65 Luxembourg 66.67 compare
- 65 Mali 66.67 compare
- 65 Niger 66.67 compare
- 65 Oman 66.67 compare
- 65 Senegal 66.67 compare
- 65 Suriname 66.67 compare
- 65 Taiwan, China 66.67 compare
- 65 Togo 66.67 compare
- 65 Tunisia 66.67 compare
- 65 Ukraine 66.67 compare
- 65 United Arab Emirates 66.67 compare
- 65 Uzbekistan 66.67 compare
- 65 Viet Nam 66.67 compare
- 65 Zambia 66.67 compare
More reference data data for France
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 18.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 11.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 14.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 106.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 15.3 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in France?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index in France was 66.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in France?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index recorded in France?
- The lowest recorded value was 66.67 in 2013.
- How does France rank for protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index?
- France ranks 65th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of shareholder rights index rising or falling in France?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this France data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of shareholder rights index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.