Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Uruguay
Uruguay: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 3 0-10 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Uruguay, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Uruguay stood at 3 0-10. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Uruguay peaked at 3 0-10 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 0-10, in 2005.
That places Uruguay 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 0-10 | 3 0-10 | 3 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 3 0-10 | 3 0-10 | 3 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 152 Bahamas 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Belize 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 0-10 compare
- 152 El Salvador 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Eritrea 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Ethiopia 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Guatemala 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Honduras 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Lesotho 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Malta 3 0-10 compare
- 152 San Marino 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Sao Tome and Principe 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Slovakia 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Solomon Islands 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Sudan 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Tonga 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Uganda 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Venezuela 3 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Uruguay?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Uruguay was 3 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 3 0-10 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Uruguay rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Uruguay ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.