Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Sudan
Sudan: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 3 0-10 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Sudan, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
Sudan recorded 3 0-10 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Sudan peaked at 3 0-10 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 0-10, in 2005.
Sudan ranks 152nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Sudan, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2007 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2008 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2009 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2010 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2011 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2012 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2013 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2014 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2015 | 2 0-10 | — |
| 2016 | 3 0-10 | +50.0% |
| 2017 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 0-10 | 0 0-10 | 0 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 1.4 0-10 | 0 0-10 | 3 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sudan
- 152 Bahamas 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Belize 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 0-10 compare
- 152 El Salvador 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Eritrea 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Ethiopia 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Guatemala 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Honduras 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Lesotho 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Malta 3 0-10 compare
- 152 San Marino 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Sao Tome and Principe 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Slovakia 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Solomon Islands 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Tonga 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Uganda 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Uruguay 3 0-10 compare
- 152 Venezuela 3 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Sudan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5846 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 17.81 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.69 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4356 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.69 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.96 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8148 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 80.68 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 93.88 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.37 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Sudan?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Sudan was 3 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 3 0-10 in 2016.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Sudan rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Sudan ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.