Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Lesotho
Lesotho: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 30 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Lesotho, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Lesotho is 30, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of up 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Lesotho peaked at 30 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 20, in 2005.
That places Lesotho 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Lesotho, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20 | — |
| 2006 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 30 | +50.0% |
| 2013 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 30 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 20 | 5 |
| 2010s | 28 | 20 | 30 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Lesotho
- 152 Bahamas 30 compare
- 152 Belize 30 compare
- 152 Bosnia and Herzegovina 30 compare
- 152 El Salvador 30 compare
- 152 Eritrea 30 compare
- 152 Ethiopia 30 compare
- 152 Guatemala 30 compare
- 152 Honduras 30 compare
- 152 Malta 30 compare
- 152 San Marino 30 compare
- 152 Sao Tome and Principe 30 compare
- 152 Slovakia 30 compare
- 152 Solomon Islands 30 compare
- 152 Sudan 30 compare
- 152 Tonga 30 compare
- 152 Uganda 30 compare
- 152 Uruguay 30 compare
- 152 Venezuela 30 compare
More reference data data for Lesotho
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0331 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5388 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0101 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1115 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0549 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Lesotho?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Lesotho was 30 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Lesotho?
- The highest recorded value was 30 in 2012.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Lesotho?
- The lowest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
- How does Lesotho rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Lesotho ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Lesotho?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lesotho data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.