Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Bahamas
Bahamas: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 30 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Bahamas, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Bahamas stood at 30. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 50.0% on the previous year and up 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Bahamas peaked at 30 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 20, in 2005.
Bahamas ranks 152nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Bahamas, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20 | — |
| 2006 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 30 | +50.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 20 | 5 |
| 2010s | 21 | 20 | 30 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Bahamas
- 152 Belize 30 compare
- 152 Bosnia and Herzegovina 30 compare
- 152 El Salvador 30 compare
- 152 Eritrea 30 compare
- 152 Ethiopia 30 compare
- 152 Guatemala 30 compare
- 152 Honduras 30 compare
- 152 Lesotho 30 compare
- 152 Malta 30 compare
- 152 San Marino 30 compare
- 152 Sao Tome and Principe 30 compare
- 152 Slovakia 30 compare
- 152 Solomon Islands 30 compare
- 152 Sudan 30 compare
- 152 Tonga 30 compare
- 152 Uganda 30 compare
- 152 Uruguay 30 compare
- 152 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 30 compare
More reference data data for Bahamas
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0325 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.018 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0775 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0145 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0228 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0325 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Bahamas?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Bahamas was 30 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Bahamas?
- The highest recorded value was 30 in 2019.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Bahamas?
- The lowest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
- How does Bahamas rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Bahamas ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Bahamas?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bahamas data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.