Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong, China: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 100 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Hong Kong, China, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Hong Kong, China stood at 100. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of up 11.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Hong Kong, China peaked at 100 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 90, in 2005.
That places Hong Kong, China 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Hong Kong, China, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 90 | — |
| 2006 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 100 | +11.1% |
| 2015 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 100 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 90 | 90 | 5 |
| 2010s | 96 | 90 | 100 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong, China
- 1 China 100 compare
- 1 Indonesia 100 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 100 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 100 compare
- 1 Kenya 100 compare
- 1 Malaysia 100 compare
- 1 New Zealand 100 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 100 compare
- 1 Singapore 100 compare
- 1 Thailand 100 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 compare
More reference data data for Hong Kong, China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0072 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4132 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0219 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 11.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 4.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.2428 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Hong Kong, China?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Hong Kong, China was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2014.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The lowest recorded value was 90 in 2005.
- How does Hong Kong, China rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Hong Kong, China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Hong Kong, China data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.