Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Hong Kong, China
100
in 2019
North Macedonia
100
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 100 against 100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 46 | 44 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 96 | 86 | 10 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Hong Kong, China or North Macedonia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 100 against 100 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.