Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Solomon Islands
Solomon Islands: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 70 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Solomon Islands, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Solomon Islands is 70, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Solomon Islands peaked at 70 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 70, in 2005.
That places Solomon Islands 38th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Solomon Islands, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 70 | — |
| 2006 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 70 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 70 | 5 |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 70 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Solomon Islands
- 38 Bangladesh 70 compare
- 38 India 70 compare
- 38 Nigeria 70 compare
- 38 Pakistan 70 compare
- 38 Albania 70 compare
- 38 Azerbaijan 70 compare
- 38 Burundi 70 compare
- 38 Colombia 70 compare
- 38 Malawi 70 compare
- 38 Thailand 70 compare
- 38 Tunisia 70 compare
- 38 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 70 compare
More reference data data for Solomon Islands
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0894 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0009 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.238 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0427 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 18.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0075 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0154 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Solomon Islands?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Solomon Islands was 70 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Solomon Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Solomon Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
- How does Solomon Islands rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Solomon Islands ranks 38th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in Solomon Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Solomon Islands data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.