Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Colombia
Colombia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 70 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Colombia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Colombia is 70, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Colombia peaked at 70 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 20, in 2005.
Colombia ranks 38th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Colombia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20 | — |
| 2006 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 70 | +250.0% |
| 2010 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 70 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 20 | 70 | 5 |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 70 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
- 38 Bangladesh 70 compare
- 38 India 70 compare
- 38 Nigeria 70 compare
- 38 Pakistan 70 compare
- 38 Albania 70 compare
- 38 Azerbaijan 70 compare
- 38 Burundi 70 compare
- 38 Malawi 70 compare
- 38 Solomon Islands 70 compare
- 38 Thailand 70 compare
- 38 Tunisia 70 compare
- 38 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 70 compare
More reference data data for Colombia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4113 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 61.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 94.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Colombia?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Colombia was 70 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was 70 in 2009.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
- How does Colombia rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Colombia ranks 38th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.