Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania
Lithuania: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 7 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
Lithuania recorded 7 DB15-20 methodology for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 75.0% over ten years.
That places Lithuania 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +25.0% |
| 2016 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +20.0% |
| 2018 | 7 DB15-20 methodology | +16.7% |
| 2019 | 7 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 1 Indonesia 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Australia 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bulgaria 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Cyprus 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Italy 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kuwait 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mongolia 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Norway 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Taiwan 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Ukraine 7 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania was 7 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 7 DB15-20 methodology in 2018.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does Lithuania rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
- Lithuania ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 75.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of corporate transparency index measures the level of information that companies must share regarding their board members, senior executives, annual meetings and audits. This index has seven components: (i) whether Buyer must disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%; (ii) whether Buyer must disclose information about board members’ primary employment and directorships in other companies; (iii) whether Buyer must disclose the compensation of individual managers; (iv) whether a detailed notice of general meeting must be sent 21 calendar days before the meeting; (v) whether shareholders representing 5% of Buyer’s share capital can put items on the general meeting agenda; (vi) whether Buyer’s annual financial statements must be audited by an external auditor; (vii) whether Buyer must disclose its audit reports to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.