Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Tanzania, United Republic of, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.
Analysis
Tanzania, United Republic of recorded 8 DB06-14 methodology for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2006 and was at its lowest, 6 DB06-14 methodology, in 2005.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | DB06-14 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +33.3% |
| 2007 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 5 |
| 2010s | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 11 United States 8.6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Bangladesh 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 India 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Japan 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Armenia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Azerbaijan 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Belarus 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Brunei Darussalam 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Colombia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Czechia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Guyana 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Israel 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Kyrgyzstan 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Lesotho 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Malaysia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Maldives 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Malta 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Marshall Islands 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Micronesia (country) 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Mongolia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Palau 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Panama 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Papua New Guinea 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Philippines 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Puerto Rico 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Samoa 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 San Marino 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Slovenia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Solomon Islands 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 South Africa 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Tonga 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Uruguay 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
More reference data data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 1,094 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 47.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 34,116 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 279.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 1,094 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Tanzania, United Republic of was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2006.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.