Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brunei Darussalam
Brunei Darussalam: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brunei Darussalam, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brunei Darussalam is 8 DB06-14 methodology, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brunei Darussalam peaked at 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2005 and was at its lowest, 8 DB06-14 methodology, in 2005.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 12th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brunei Darussalam, year by year
| Year | DB06-14 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 5 |
| 2010s | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brunei Darussalam
- 11 United States 8.6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Bangladesh 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 India 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Japan 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Armenia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Azerbaijan 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Belarus 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Colombia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Czechia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Guyana 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Israel 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Kyrgyzstan 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Lesotho 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Malaysia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Maldives 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Malta 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Marshall Islands 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Micronesia (country) 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Mongolia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Palau 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Panama 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Papua New Guinea 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Philippines 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Puerto Rico 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Samoa 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 San Marino 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Slovenia 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Solomon Islands 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 South Africa 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Tanzania, United Republic of 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Tonga 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 12 Uruguay 8 DB06-14 methodology compare
More reference data data for Brunei Darussalam
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5816 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 154.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0005 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.1416 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2382 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 89.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 63.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 23.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0098 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brunei Darussalam?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brunei Darussalam was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Brunei Darussalam?
- The highest recorded value was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Brunei Darussalam?
- The lowest recorded value was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- How does Brunei Darussalam rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Brunei Darussalam?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Brunei Darussalam data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.