Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya

Libya: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 3 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
3 DB06-14 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
152nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
3 DB06-14 methodology
in 2012
All-time low
2 DB06-14 methodology
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya, 2005–2013

01232005200920132005: 2 DB06-14 methodology2006: 2 DB06-14 methodology2007: 2 DB06-14 methodology2008: 2 DB06-14 methodology2009: 2 DB06-14 methodology2010: 2 DB06-14 methodology2011: 2 DB06-14 methodology2012: 3 DB06-14 methodology2013: 3 DB06-14 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya stood at 3 DB06-14 methodology. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is up 50.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya peaked at 3 DB06-14 methodology in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2 DB06-14 methodology, in 2005.

Libya ranks 152nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) in Libya, 2005 to 2013.
Year DB06-14 methodology Change
2005 2 DB06-14 methodology
2006 2 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2007 2 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2008 2 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2009 2 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2010 2 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2011 2 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2012 3 DB06-14 methodology +50.0%
2013 3 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2 DB06-14 methodology 2 DB06-14 methodology 2 DB06-14 methodology 5
2010s 2.5 DB06-14 methodology 2 DB06-14 methodology 3 DB06-14 methodology 4

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 152 Indonesia 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  2. 152 Brazil 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  3. 152 Bahrain 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  4. 152 Benin 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  5. 152 Botswana 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  6. 152 Burkina Faso 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  7. 152 Cambodia 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  8. 152 Chad 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  9. 152 Comoros 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  10. 152 Congo 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  11. 152 Côte d'Ivoire 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  12. 152 Egypt 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  13. 152 Gabon 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  14. 152 Guinea 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  15. 152 Kosovo 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  16. 152 Kuwait 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  17. 152 Luxembourg 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  18. 152 Mali 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  19. 152 Niger 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  20. 152 Togo 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  21. 152 United Arab Emirates 3 DB06-14 methodology compare
  22. 152 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3 DB06-14 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya?
Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya was 3 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB06-14 methodology in 2012.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
How does Libya rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
Libya ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/libya/">Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Libya</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)
Unit
DB06-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain cate­gories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.