Comoros vs Libya: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Comoros
- Libya
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 3 DB06-14 methodology against 3 DB06-14 methodology in Libya, a difference of 0 DB06-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 152nd and Libya ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB06-14 methodology | 2 DB06-14 methodology | 1 DB06-14 methodology | Comoros |
| 2010s | 3 DB06-14 methodology | 2.5 DB06-14 methodology | 0.5 DB06-14 methodology | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Comoros or Libya?
- Comoros, at 3 DB06-14 methodology against 3 DB06-14 methodology in Libya as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Comoros and Libya?
- 0 DB06-14 methodology, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Libya?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Comoros and Libya rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Comoros ranks 152nd and Libya ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.