Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Timor-Leste
Timor-Leste: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 40 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Timor-Leste, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Timor-Leste stood at 40. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Timor-Leste peaked at 40 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 40, in 2005.
Timor-Leste ranks 132nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Timor-Leste, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 40 | — |
| 2006 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 40 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 40 | 5 |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 40 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Timor-Leste
- 132 China 40 compare
- 132 Mexico 40 compare
- 132 Algeria 40 compare
- 132 Cameroon 40 compare
- 132 Equatorial Guinea 40 compare
- 132 Haiti 40 compare
- 132 Honduras 40 compare
- 132 Iraq 40 compare
- 132 Jamaica 40 compare
- 132 Myanmar 40 compare
- 132 North Macedonia 40 compare
- 132 Romania 40 compare
- 132 Rwanda 40 compare
- 132 Saudi Arabia 40 compare
- 132 Serbia 40 compare
- 132 South Sudan 40 compare
- 132 Sudan 40 compare
- 132 Switzerland 40 compare
- 132 Zimbabwe 40 compare
More reference data data for Timor-Leste
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 17.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4255 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2854 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0096 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 171.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1569 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 112.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 41.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 75.64 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Timor-Leste?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Timor-Leste was 40 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Timor-Leste?
- The highest recorded value was 40 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Timor-Leste?
- The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2005.
- How does Timor-Leste rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Timor-Leste ranks 132nd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Timor-Leste?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Timor-Leste data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.