Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in North Macedonia
North Macedonia: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 40 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in North Macedonia, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in North Macedonia stood at 40. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is up 33.3% on the previous year and up 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in North Macedonia peaked at 40 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 30, in 2005.
That places North Macedonia 132nd out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in North Macedonia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 30 | — |
| 2006 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 40 | +33.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 30 | 30 | 5 |
| 2010s | 32.5 | 30 | 40 | 4 |
Countries ranked near North Macedonia
- 132 China 40 compare
- 132 Mexico 40 compare
- 132 Algeria 40 compare
- 132 Cameroon 40 compare
- 132 Equatorial Guinea 40 compare
- 132 Haiti 40 compare
- 132 Honduras 40 compare
- 132 Iraq 40 compare
- 132 Jamaica 40 compare
- 132 Myanmar 40 compare
- 132 Romania 40 compare
- 132 Rwanda 40 compare
- 132 Saudi Arabia 40 compare
- 132 Serbia 40 compare
- 132 South Sudan 40 compare
- 132 Sudan 40 compare
- 132 Switzerland 40 compare
- 132 Timor-Leste 40 compare
- 132 Zimbabwe 40 compare
More reference data data for North Macedonia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1665 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0308 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.342 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.224 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6296 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.168 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in North Macedonia?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in North Macedonia was 40 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in North Macedonia?
- The highest recorded value was 40 in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in North Macedonia?
- The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
- How does North Macedonia rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- North Macedonia ranks 132nd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in North Macedonia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this North Macedonia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.