Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Côte d'Ivoire
Côte d'Ivoire: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 30 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Côte d'Ivoire, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Côte d'Ivoire recorded 30 for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Côte d'Ivoire peaked at 30 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 30, in 2005.
That places Côte d'Ivoire 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Côte d'Ivoire, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 30 | — |
| 2006 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 30 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 30 | 30 | 5 |
| 2010s | 30 | 30 | 30 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Côte d'Ivoire
- 152 Indonesia 30 compare
- 152 Brazil 30 compare
- 152 Bahrain 30 compare
- 152 Benin 30 compare
- 152 Botswana 30 compare
- 152 Burkina Faso 30 compare
- 152 Cambodia 30 compare
- 152 Chad 30 compare
- 152 Comoros 30 compare
- 152 Congo 30 compare
- 152 Egypt 30 compare
- 152 Gabon 30 compare
- 152 Guinea 30 compare
- 152 Kosovo 30 compare
- 152 Kuwait 30 compare
- 152 Libya 30 compare
- 152 Luxembourg 30 compare
- 152 Mali 30 compare
- 152 Niger 30 compare
- 152 Togo 30 compare
- 152 United Arab Emirates 30 compare
- 152 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 30 compare
More reference data data for Côte d'Ivoire
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 20.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 125.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 6.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8419 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0792 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,604 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Côte d'Ivoire?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Côte d'Ivoire was 30 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
- The highest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
- The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
- How does Côte d'Ivoire rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Côte d'Ivoire?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Côte d'Ivoire data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.