Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brazil
Brazil: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 30 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brazil, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 30 for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brazil peaked at 30 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 30, in 2005.
Brazil ranks 152nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 30 | — |
| 2006 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 30 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 30 | 30 | 5 |
| 2010s | 30 | 30 | 30 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 152 Indonesia 30 compare
- 152 Bahrain 30 compare
- 152 Benin 30 compare
- 152 Botswana 30 compare
- 152 Burkina Faso 30 compare
- 152 Cambodia 30 compare
- 152 Chad 30 compare
- 152 Comoros 30 compare
- 152 Congo 30 compare
- 152 Côte d'Ivoire 30 compare
- 152 Egypt 30 compare
- 152 Gabon 30 compare
- 152 Guinea 30 compare
- 152 Kosovo 30 compare
- 152 Kuwait 30 compare
- 152 Libya 30 compare
- 152 Luxembourg 30 compare
- 152 Mali 30 compare
- 152 Niger 30 compare
- 152 Togo 30 compare
- 152 United Arab Emirates 30 compare
- 152 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 30 compare
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brazil?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Brazil was 30 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
- How does Brazil rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Brazil ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.