Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country)

Micronesia (country): Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 16 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
16
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
186th
of 191 countries
All-time high
16
in 2013
All-time low
16
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country), 2013–2019

0510152013201620192013: 162014: 162015: 162016: 162017: 162018: 162019: 16

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Micronesia (country) stood at 16. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Micronesia (country) ranks 186th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country), year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country), 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 16 —
2014 16 +0.0%
2015 16 +0.0%
2016 16 +0.0%
2017 16 +0.0%
2018 16 +0.0%
2019 16 +0.0%

Micronesia (country) compared with similar countries

  • Micronesia (country)'s 16 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57, 28% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Micronesia (country)'s 16 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 54, 30% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)

  1. 184 Haiti 18 compare
  2. 184 Libya 18 compare
  3. 186 Eritrea 16 compare
  4. 186 South Sudan 16 compare
  5. 189 Palau 14 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Micronesia (country)

All data for Micronesia (country) →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Micronesia (country)?
Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Micronesia (country) was 16 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?
The highest recorded value was 16 in 2013.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?
The lowest recorded value was 16 in 2013.
How does Micronesia (country) rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 186th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country). Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/micronesia-fed-sts/">Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.