Libya vs Micronesia (country): Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

Libya
18
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
16
in 2019
Libya rank
181st
Micronesia (country) rank
183rd

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Libya
  • Micronesia (country)
05101520201320162019

How they compare

Libya currently reports 18 against 16 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 2.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia (country)'s.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 181st and Micronesia (country) ranks 183rd of 188 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Libya or Micronesia (country)?
Libya, at 18 against 16 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Libya and Micronesia (country)?
2, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Micronesia (country)?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do Libya and Micronesia (country) rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Libya ranks 181st and Micronesia (country) ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,330 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.