How does Japan rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?

Japan ranks 57th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Japan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Japan

Name: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Japan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Japan: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 64 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

57th

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2013

All-time low

in 2013

Years of data

2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Japan, 2013–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Japan stood at 64. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Japan 57th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Japan

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Japan

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,290 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0529 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.49 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.52 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3629 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.57 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.981 (2050)

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Japan?: Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Japan was 64 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Japan?: The highest recorded value was 64 in 2013.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Japan?: The lowest recorded value was 64 in 2013.
How does Japan rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?: Japan ranks 57th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Japan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,330 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.