Australia vs Japan: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Australia
64
in 2019
Japan
64
in 2019
Australia rank
57th
Japan rank
57th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Japan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 64 against 64 in Japan, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 57th and Japan ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Australia or Japan?
- Australia, at 64 against 64 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Australia and Japan?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Japan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Japan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 57th and Japan ranks 57th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.