Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Guinea-Bissau

Guinea-Bissau: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 44 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
44
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
114th
of 191 countries
All-time high
44
in 2014
All-time low
40
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Guinea-Bissau, 2013–2019

0102030402013201620192013: 402014: 442015: 442016: 442017: 442018: 442019: 44

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Guinea-Bissau is 44, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

The figure is up 10.0% over ten years.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 114th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Guinea-Bissau, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Guinea-Bissau, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 40 —
2014 44 +10.0%
2015 44 +0.0%
2016 44 +0.0%
2017 44 +0.0%
2018 44 +0.0%
2019 44 +0.0%

Guinea-Bissau compared with similar countries

  • Guinea-Bissau's 44 is above the median for low income countries, which is 33, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Guinea-Bissau's 44 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 34, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau

  1. 111 Albania 46 compare
  2. 111 Bhutan 46 compare
  3. 111 Iraq 46 compare
  4. 114 Ecuador 44 compare
  5. 114 Lebanon 44 compare
  6. 114 Rwanda 44 compare
  7. 114 Senegal 44 compare
  8. 114 Palestine 44 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Guinea-Bissau

All data for Guinea-Bissau →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Guinea-Bissau?
Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Guinea-Bissau was 44 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The highest recorded value was 44 in 2014.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2013.
How does Guinea-Bissau rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 114th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
Over the last ten years it is up 10.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Guinea-Bissau. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/guinea-bissau/">Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Guinea-Bissau</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.