Bhutan vs Guinea-Bissau: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Bhutan
46
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
44
in 2019
Bhutan rank
111th
Guinea-Bissau rank
114th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bhutan
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 46 against 44 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 111th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 114th of 190 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Guinea-Bissau?
- Bhutan, at 46 against 44 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Guinea-Bissau?
- 2, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Guinea-Bissau?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Bhutan ranks 111th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 114th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.